free page hit counter
« #9 Re: Nike Air Jordan V XVIII CDP and NB Pigeon SneakGeekZ #25
michael jordan shoes »

TV commercial for Nike “Revolution”


1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Free Tools: Link Me (New) Print This Post Print This Post 77 views

TV commercial for Nike “Revolution”

Tags: , , , ,

Share this post:

 Del.icio.us Digg Technorati StumbleUpon

Related Posts

This entry was posted on Monday, November 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am and is filed under Other (Nike). You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

25 Responses to “TV commercial for Nike “Revolution””

  1. unclepic1 Says:
    November 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am

    wtf so stupid u cant do that it makes no sense the had to pay 250,000 to apple for using this song

  2. AmbulanceProductions Says:
    November 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am

    hahaha man that nutsack is hilarious

  3. kevin121 Says:
    November 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am

    hahaha thats def a nutsack at 0:16

  4. WantonChicken Says:
    November 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am

    right, this is the reason he’ll burn in hell for.

  5. voondebayosh Says:
    November 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am

    0:16 nutsack

  6. dellaprosper Says:
    November 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am

    I remember this commercial…one of my favorites of its time…I even recall the controversy over the song

  7. smitty01209 Says:
    November 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am

    Yoko Ono didn’t own the rights to the original version.
    Pretty convincing bullshit, though.

  8. Butlins Says:
    November 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am

    Yoko Ono gave the go-head without consulting Paul, George or Ringo. As George said, (paraphrase) “Nike was going to have Julian Lennon do a cover version, but because Yoko doesn’t like Julian, she gave Nike permission to use the original Beatles version.” Since then the involved parties made a rule that no original Beatles recordings can be used in ads. But you will hear cover versions of their songs in ads.

  9. t3rr3nc388 Says:
    November 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am

    I didn’t say today…obviously they are back in the collective conscious. I promise you though 21 years ago it was to old to be recent and too recent to be retro. all you have to do is check the fact that Mcarntney let himself get outbit at any price. If people were snatching the music up, it would have been a no brainer to own your own music, but even he didn’t realize the potential.

  10. kevin121 Says:
    November 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am

    michael jackson will burn in hell for this catastrophe

  11. me24546 Says:
    November 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am

    yeah, they covered hello goodbye

    its pretty disgusting

  12. phillyd44 Says:
    November 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am

    the jonas brothers covered a beatles song? it is the end of the world.

  13. karstdg Says:
    November 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am

    Don’t you know it’s gonna be allright?

  14. me24546 Says:
    November 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am

    beatles fans everywhere have to get together and raise money to buy the rights to the songs from micheal jackson

    to stop the comericals and bad covers and prevent future damage from being done, so that these songs can live on forever without being “that song from the diaper commerical” or “that song that the jonas brothers covered”

  15. xhappyaccidentx Says:
    November 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am

    jehternf, its not fuck nikey. its fuck michael faget jackson. that dick gave this song to nike to use for a fuckin sneaker commercial ! DAMN PEDOPHILE ! ugh. sorry, but this shit just pisses me off, immensely !

  16. AllieHalfEmpty Says:
    November 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am

    THIS SONG IS NOT ABOUT SELLING SHOES.

  17. urlocalSAVAGE Says:
    November 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am

    you’d be surprised to find out who was listening to the beatles in 87 and even today.

  18. jehternf Says:
    November 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am

    this commercial is a bunch of fucking bull shit
    the song is anti commercial, fuck u nikey

  19. phillyd44 Says:
    November 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am

    revolution is about a revolution no about stupid pair of sneakers

  20. t3rr3nc388 Says:
    November 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am

    this commershul was the best thing that ever happened to that song cuz the beattles weren’t on anybodies radar in 1987.

  21. t3rr3nc388 Says:
    November 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am

    uh yall sound like a bunch of dumbasses. it’s the music business…if you think emi isn’t a multinational corporation and the beattles gave their music away your retarded. they buy and sell music as a comodity. you want to make speeches about this being sacred. it’s not. paul maccarntney aint fight in no revolution, he could hire an army if he needed one because you people support his lavish lifestyle by purchasing this shyt.

  22. t3rr3nc388 Says:
    November 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am

    the mutha phuka who could afford it. Not like ur broke arese or even paul who he out bid…hahahahahahaha

  23. lbonista Says:
    November 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am

    totally understanable! Target is my guilty pleasure even though is tres’ trashy
    I dont like nike though, adidas all the way

  24. ultamatebeatlefan Says:
    November 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am

    i dont they ruin a song and i hate target

  25. lbonista Says:
    November 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am

    i love targets hello goodbuy commercials!

Leave a Reply